Cases 61 - 70 of 631
Lamar Reese v. Richard Bowen
as 21-3595
Petitioner / Appellant:
LAMAR REESE
Respondent / Appellee:
STATE OF OHIO and RICHARD BOWEN, Warden
Michael Chieco, et al v. Kia Motors America, Inc., et al
as 21-55580
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL DAVIS, CHARLES KORGER, Jr., DANIEL REILLEY and others
Appellant:
BLEICHMAN & KLEIN
Defendant / Appellee:
KIA MOTORS AMERICA, INC. and HYUNDAI MOTOR AMERICA, FKA Hyundai Motor Company
In re: Robert Reese
as 21-3378
Petitioner:
In re: ROBERT L. REESE, Derivatively on Behalf of Defendant Fifth Third Bancorp
In re: Syngenta AG MIR162
as 21-3121
Not Classified By Court:
In re: GRAY REED & MCGRAW LLP, WATTS GUERRA LLP, GRAY REED & MCGRAW LLP and others
Appellee:
ABREO & CARTER, BARRETT WYLIE, LLC, W. DEAN BELK, JR., Attorney at Law and others
Appellant:
STUEVE SIEGEL HANSON LLP, HARE, WYNN, NEWELL & NEWTON, GRAY REED & MCGRAW, P.C. and others
US v. Perry Reese, III
as 21-7024
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
PERRY REESE, III
Brett v. Trump et al
as 1:2021cv01383
Defendant:
John Thents, Mr. Brenichre, Carl Thume and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Brett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Racketeering (RICO) Act
USA v. Terrell Reese
as 21-2652
Defendant / Appellant:
TERRELL REESE
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Toriandre Givens v. Multnomah County Sheriff, et al
as 21-35338
Defendant / Appellee:
INVERNESS JAIL, STATE OF OREGON, MULTNOMAH COUNTY SHERIFF and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TORIANDRE T. GIVENS
United States v. Dontay Reese
as 21-2321
Defendant / Appellant:
Dontay Lavarice Reese
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
HANKINS v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2021cv01066
Defendant:
WAKE COUNTY CHILD PROTECTION SERVICE, NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS, WEST COUNTY DISTRICT COURT and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY OMAR HANKINS, SR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
