Cases 61 - 70 of 197
Quoquoi v. Department of Health and Human
as 10-5069
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Gadema K. Quoquoi
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Department of Health & Human Services, Sprint Nextel, Verizon Communications Inc. and others
Tallal v. Sprint Nextel Corporation
as 4:2010cv05660
Plaintiff:
Scott Tallal , Al Alberto , Craig Morris and others
Defendant:
Sprint Nextel Corporation , Sprint Solutions Inc. , Sprint Spectrum LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tallal v. Sprint Nextel Corporation
as 3:2010cv05660
Plaintiff:
Scott Tallal
Defendant:
Sprint Nextel Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sprint Nextel Corporation v. ICO Global Communications (Holdings) Limited
as 1:2010cv01404
Plaintiff:
Sprint Nextel Corporation
Defendant:
ICO Global Communications (Holdings) Limited
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 201
Lockhart et al v. Sprint Nextel Corporation
as 4:2010cv05621
Plaintiff:
Arlene Baisa Lockhart and Gene Lockhart
Defendant:
Sprint Nextel Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lockhart et al v. Sprint Nextel Corporation
as 3:2010cv05621
Plaintiff:
Arlene Baisa Lockhart and Gene Lockhart
Defendant:
Sprint Nextel Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv06403
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
KIM et al v. SPRINT NEXTEL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv06334
Plaintiff:
ELBERT KIM and WENDY POLOS
Defendant:
SPRINT NEXTEL CORPORATION and SPRINT SPECTRUM L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Kimdara Sok v. Sprint Nextel Corporation et al
as 8:2010cv01858
Defendant:
DOES and Sprint Nextel Corporation
Plaintiff:
Kimdara Sok
Cellco Partnership, et al v. Jim Morris, et al
as 10-8037
Petitioner:
CELLCO PARTNERSHIP, CELLCO PARTNERSHIP, AT&T MOBILITY, LLC and others
Respondent:
JIM MORRIS, MICHELLE MCCLAIN, VAUGHANZELLA SMITH-HOWARD and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
