Cases 61 - 69 of 69
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2007cv01113
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv03082
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00173
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Mendez v. The TJX Companies, Inc.
as 1:2007cv02486
Plaintiff:
Monica Mendez and Monica Mendez
Defendant:
The TJX Companies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv02170
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Ramirez v. The TJX Companies, Inc. et al
as 2:2007cv02115
Plaintiff:
Lety Ramirez, Lety Ramirez, Lety Ramirez and others
Defendant:
TJX Companies, Inc., TJX Companies, Inc., TJX Companies, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv00091
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv00503
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
NIKKEN USA V ROBINSONS-MAY
as 01-1420
Defendant/Cross Appellant:
ACE HARDWARE CORP., AMERICAN DRUG STORES, INC., BED BATH & BEYOND, INC. and others
Defendant-Appellee:
AMES DEPARTMENT STORES, INC., COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION, PRICESMART and others
Plaintiff-Appellant:
NIKKEN USA, INC. (aka Nikken, Inc.), NIKKEN USA, INC. (aka Nikken, Inc.) and NIKKEN USA, INC. (aka Nikken, Inc.)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
