Cases 61 - 70 of 37,487
Perkins v. Panorama Towers Condominium Unit Owners Association, Inc., et al.
as 24-3329
Plaintiff:
PRESTON D. PERKINS, JR.
Defendant:
PANORAMA TOWERS CONDOMINIUM UNIT OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., DENNIS KARIGER, LUCKY LACT, LLC and others
United States of America v. Gray
as 24-3322
Defendant:
ANDREW STEVEN GRAY and Stryder D Austin
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Earl Dowty v. Brent Fluke, et al
as 24-2084
Petitioner:
Earl D. Dowty
Respondent:
Brent Fluke, Warden and Attorney General for the State of South Dakota
Jeton Lita/Simon Bolivar Express Trust v. Calhoun et al
as 2:2024cv02714
Plaintiff:
Jeton Lita/Simon Bolivar Express Trust
Defendant:
Brad C. Calhoun, Teachers Federal Credit Union, Timothy M. Southerton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Ahmed Kamel Salim Obo Saada v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 8:2024cv01111
Plaintiff:
AHMED KAMEL SALIM ABO SAADA
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, Los Angeles Asylum Office and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Braddock v. CSC Productions, LLC,
as 8:2024cv01240
Plaintiff:
Cody Braddock
Defendant:
CSC Productions, LLC, d/b/a Nutrition Solutions
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Kenneth ThorntonIn re: Kenneth Thornton
as 24-1941
Petitioner:
In re: KENNETH E. THORNTON
Respondent:
BEAVER COUNTY DETECTIVES OFFICE, in her official capacity, PETER CARBONE, in his individual and official capacity, MARLENE EVERETTE, in her individual and official capacity and others
Defendant:
LISA JONES, in her individual capacity and SHARON D. BUCKLEY, in her individual capacity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
