Cases 71 - 80 of 4,062
Arek v. American Airlines Group Inc., et al.
as 23-4394
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN EVANS AREK
Defendant / Appellee:
AMERICAN AIRLINES GROUP INC. and AMERICAN AIRLINES
Weiss et al v. Peacock TV, LLC
as 7:2023cv11037
Plaintiff:
Daniel Weiss and McKenzie Evans
Defendant:
Peacock TV LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Evans Delivery Company, Inc. v. GFA Alabama, Inc.
as 1:2023cv05798
Plaintiff:
Evans Delivery Company, Inc.
Defendant:
GFA Alabama, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
US v. Timothy Evans
as 23-4744
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
TIMOTHY BRANDON EVANS
Haggart v. US
as 24-1256
Plaintiff:
DANIEL HAGGART, KATHY HAGGART, Husband and Wife, For Themselves and As Representatives of a Class of Similarly Situated Persons, GORDON ARTHUR WOODLEY, Personal Counsel for Kittinger Deed Claimants and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DENISE LYNN WOODLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
United States of America v. Goodman (Jamarr Simmons)
as 23-7971
Defendant:
JERLAINE LITTLE, DARON GOODMAN, ALBERT SHOULDERS and others
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMARR SIMMONS and Sealed Defendant 2
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Lux v. Kelly
as 23-4019
Petitioner / Appellant:
EVAN P. LUX
Respondent / Appellee:
BRANDON KELLY, Superintendent of OSP
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05591
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Federal Trade Commission v. Traffic and Funnels, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv01277
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Defendant:
Traffic and Funnels, LLC, WE Capital, LLC a limited liability company, also d/b/a The Sales Mentor and The Sales Mentor, LLC, Evans and Welch, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 6101 Federal Trade Commission's Telemarketing Sales Rule
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
