Cases 71 - 80 of 180
In re Behr Process Corp.,
as CAC/8:17-cv-01016
Plaintiff:
Darin Richey , Aaron Amborn , Laurie McCall and others
Defendant:
Behr Process Corp. , Behr Paint Corp. , Masco Corp. and others
Watkins et al v. Lawrence County, Arkansas et al
as 3:2017cv00272
Plaintiff:
Cleo Watkins , Pyles Family Farms LLC , Victor Hutcherson and others
Defendant:
Lawrence County, Arkansas, John Thomison, William Powell and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
Tribal Council of the Cheyenne and Arapaho Tribes of Oklahoma et al v. Foster et al
as 5:2017cv01048
Plaintiff:
Tribal Council of the Cheyenne and Arapaho Tribes of Oklahoma , Jennifer Wilkinson , Darryl Seger and others
Defendant:
Brian Foster, Mark Cody, Tom Fox and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Darin Richey v. Behr Process Corp. et al
as 8:2017cv01016
Plaintiff:
Aaron Amborn, Laurie McCall, Thomas Noftzger and others
Defendant:
Behr Paint Corp., Behr Process Corp., Masco Corp. and others
Hines v. City of New Port Richey, Florida
as 8:2017mc00038
Plaintiff:
Sidney C. Hines
Defendant:
City of New Port Richey, Florida
Joseph Broyles, et al v. Cantor Fitzgerald & Company, et al
as 17-30092
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH N. BROYLES, ANNE RICHEY, KAREN L. BARRANCO and others
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH ADVISORS, INCORPORATED, WALTER MORALES, STONE & YOUNGBERG, L.L.C. and others
Willenborg v. Newcastle Home Loans, LLC
as 1:2016mc00104
Plaintiff:
Matt Willenborg
Defendant:
Newcastle Home Loans, LLC
Respondent:
Richey May & Co.
Craig Richey v. United State
as 16-1844
Petitioner:
Craig Richey
Respondent:
United States of America
RICHEY v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as PAE/2:15-cv-04587
Plaintiff:
DAVID L. RICHEY
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON and JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Richey v. Chestnut Exploration and Production Inc et al
as 3:2015mc00124
Plaintiff:
Earl E Richey, Jr
Defendant:
Chestnut Exploration and Production Inc and Mark Plummer
Movant:
Plummer Exploration Inc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
