Cases 71 - 80 of 534
Janet Nelums v. John Waites
as 22-1223
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JANET LOUISE NELUMS and CHRIS NELUMS
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN E. WAITES, United States Bankruptcy Court, Chief Judge an individual, JEFFREY M. TZERMAN LAW FIRM P.A., an individual, H. GUYTON MURRELL, Scott and Corley, P.A H., an Individual and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00162
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-55107
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv20208
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv03390
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2021cv82125
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Massey v. Specialized Loan Servicing, et al
as 21-1441
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES HARRISON MASSEY
Defendant / Appellee:
COMPUTERSHARE LOAN SERVICES, BANK OF AMERICA and SPECIALIZED LOAN SERVICING, LLC
Defendant:
COMPUTERSHARE LIMITED, COMPUTERSHARE US, INC., COMPUTERSHARE MORTGAGE SERVICES, INC. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv05200
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv05233
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Omega v. Specialized Loan Servicing LLC
as 0:2021cv62385
Plaintiff:
Mimaye Omega and Mimaye Omegat
Defendant:
Specialized Loan Servicing LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
