Cases 81 - 90 of 791
Gill v. Crockett
as 21-51129
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Rudolfo Gill
Defendant / Appellee:
Charlene Crockett, Unit Captain, R. Almanza, Assistant Warden, Ms. Williams, Lieutenant and others
Gill v. Viatris Inc. et al *** REMINDER TO COUNSEL -- This case is a tag-a-long action to 17-md-2785, MDL 2785 In Re: Epipen (Epinepherine Injection USP) Marketing, Sales Practices and Antitrust Litigation.***
as 2:2021cv02534
Plaintiff:
Michael Gill
Defendant:
Viatris Inc., MYLAN SPECIALTY L.P., Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Larry Cortinas v. Ravijot Gill, Jr., et al
as 21-16888
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LARRY WILLIAM CORTINAS
Defendant / Appellee:
RAVIJOT GILL, Jr., PIERRETTE LENOIR, CONALL MCCABE and others
Gill v. Viatris Inc. et al
as 5:2021cv01187
Plaintiff:
Michael Gill
Defendant:
Viatris Inc., Mylan Specialty L.P., Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv07755
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Gill v. Capstead Mortgage Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv07973
Plaintiff:
Randy Gill
Defendant:
Capstead Mortgage Corporation, Pat Augustine, Jack E. Biegler and others
US v. Jane Gill
as 21-4502
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JANE IVISON GILL
Pedro Rodriguez v. Fisher Agostini, et al
as 21-16520
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PEDRO RODRIGUEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
FISHER C. AGOSTINI, DOCTOR GILL, C. AMADOR and others
Julian v. MetLife, Inc.
as 21-2209
Petitioner:
Tonya Gill, Stephanie McKinney, Harris Kimberly and others
Respondent:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Ryan v. Strongbridge Biopharma plc et al
as 1:2021cv07256
Plaintiff:
John Ryan
Defendant:
Strongbridge Biopharma plc, John H. Johnson, Garheng Kong and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
