Cases 81 - 90 of 139
Michael Lounsbury v. Jeff Premo
as 13-73883
Petitioner:
MICHAEL RAY LOUNSBURY
Respondent:
JEFF PREMO
Hall et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as WVS/2:13-cv-24442
Plaintiff:
Chereasa Jean Hall and Michael Ray Hall
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Langston v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as WVS/2:13-cv-22894
Plaintiff:
Ruth Edna Langston and Michael Ray Langston
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
STRAWSER et al v. MEDVENTURE TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, et al
as INS/4:13-cv-00121
Plaintiff:
TERRY STRAWSER , ELENA AGUAYO , CHRISTY ALLENBAUGH and others
Defendant:
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION and MEDVENTURE TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
IN RE: FAILURE TO COMPLY
as 1:2013mc00057
Respondent:
JAMES ANDREW LOWES, JOSEPH ALLAN KELLEY, JANA ASHLEY HAGEMAN and others
In Re:
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS, NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES, AND/OR FAILURE TO SUBMIT IOLTA CERTIFICATION
Thomas et al v. PAR, Inc. et al
as 4:2013cv00469
Defendant:
Michael Ray Thomas and Kathryn Thomas
Third_party_defendant:
PAR, Inc. , Atlas Creditor Services, LLC, Kathryn Thomas and others
Plaintiff:
Santander Consumer USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
USA v. Michael Kapp
as 12-10626
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL RAY KAPP, AKA Michael Kapp
Owens et al v. Republic of Sudan et al
as 1:2012mc00050
Plaintiff:
James Owens, Gary Robert Owens, Barbara Goff and others
Defendant:
Republic of Sudan, Ministry of the Interior of the Republic of the Sudan, The Islamic Republic of Iran and others
OWENS et al v. REPUBLIC OF SUDAN
as 2:2012cv04605
Plaintiff:
JAMES OWENS , GARY ROBERT OWENS , BARBARA GOFF and others
Defendant:
REPUBLIC OF SUDAN, MINISTRY OF THE INTERIOR OF THE REPUBLIC OF THE SUDAN, THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
