Cases 81 - 90 of 221
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2020cv02133
Defendant:
COHN GOLDBERG & DEUTSCH, LLC, RUSHMORE LOAN MANAGEMENT SERVICES LLC and NO PARTY
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02496
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01059
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00314
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Richissin et al v. Rushmore Loan Management Services, LLC, et al
as 1:2020cv00871
Plaintiff:
Timothy J. Richissin and Heidi C. Richissin
Defendant:
Rushmore Loan Management Services, LLC and U.S. Bank Trust National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv21802
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Synthesis Industrial Holdings v. U.S. Bank National Association, et al
as 20-16035
Appellant:
SYNTHESIS INDUSTRIAL HOLDINGS 1 LLC
Appellee:
RUSHMORE LOAN MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLC and U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, not in its Individual Capacity, but solely as Trustee for the RMAC Trust Series 2016-CTT
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01008
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Smith v. Rushmore Loan Management Services, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv01860
Plaintiff:
Danielle Everett Smith
Defendant:
Rushmore Loan Management Services, LLC and Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Poynter v. Rushmore Loan Management Services, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv00247
Defendant:
Rushmore Loan Management Services, LLC, RMAC Trust, Series 2016-CTT and OWS 2019-LT1
Plaintiff:
Eric Poynter
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
