Cases 81 - 90 of 158
William J. Mabie v. USMS
as 18-2580
Petitioner:
WILLIAM J. MABIE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE
Cunningham v. United States Marshal Service
as 18-1903
Petitioner:
Benjamin Cunningham
Respondent:
United States Marshals Service
WOODWARD v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2018cv01249
Plaintiff:
MARIO DION WOODWARD
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
MABIE v. UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE et al
as 2:2018cv00216
Defendant:
ALTON CITY JAIL, SAINT LOUIS METROPOLITAN POLICE and UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM MABIE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Clarence A Branch III v. United States of America et al
as 2:2018cv01973
Plaintiff:
Clarence A. Branch, III
Defendant:
Director of Commerce, William Jones, Mike Riggs and others
In Re: Jason Akande
as 17-3318
Petitioner:
Jason Shola Akande
Respondent:
United States Marshal Service, Director, Geoffrey M. Stone, Connecticut U.S. Attorney, Grace Ann Wisniewski, ICE Special Agent and others
Camillo-Amisano v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2017cv06634
Petitioner:
Phillip Camillo-Amisano
Respondent:
Federal Bureau Of Prisons, Steve Langford and United States Marshals Service
BANKS v. COCAS et al
as 2:2017mc00673
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
DONOVAN COCAS, ADRIAN N. ROE, MCKEE and others
John May v. Inter-Con Security Systems, Inc., et al
as 2:2017cv05177
Defendant:
Does, Inter-Con Security Systems, Inc. and United States Marshals Service
Plaintiff:
John May
United States of America et al
as 1:2017mc00434
In Re:
In the Matter of the United States of America's Request for an Ex Parte Order Authorizing the United States Marshals Service to Seize the Content of any Safety Boxes
Petitioner:
United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
