Cases 1 - 10 of 292
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv06651
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Hazari v. Santa Clara County Superior Court, et al.
as 24-3353
Plaintiff:
CYRUS HAZARI
Defendant:
SANTA CLARA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, APPEAL COURT OF THE SIXTH DISTRICT, CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT and others
Francielica Da Silva, et al v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-1893
Petitioner:
FRANCIELICA GESSICA DA SILVA, JOAO ROSA PEREIRA-DA SILVA, A. P.-D. S. and others
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Leonardo Pereira v. Niva Costa Cruz Gunter
as 24-11162
Plaintiff:
LEONARDO DE CARVALHO PEREIRA
Defendant:
NIVA COSTA CRUZ GUNTER
Ricardo Fernandes-Gomes, et al v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-1392
Petitioner:
RICARDO FERNANDES-GOMES, JESSICA CARDOSO PEREIRA-FERNANDES and H. A. C-F.
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Pereira-Nolasco v. Garland
as 24-1246
Petitioner:
LAURA ANGELICA PEREIRA-NOLASCO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Pereira
as 1:2024cv20757
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Paul A Pereira and Paul A. Pereira
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0077 Securities Fraud
Genivaldo Pimenta, et al v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-1354
Petitioner:
GENIVALDO PEREIRA PIMENTA, QUEITANI DE SOUZA ALVES and CARLOS EDUARDO SOUZA PEREIRA ALVES
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Pereira Neto, et al v. Garland
as 24-1058
Petitioner:
CONSTANTINO PEREIRA NETO and SURAYA SILVESTRE PEREIRA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Callier v. Direct 2 Home LLC
as 3:2024cv30005
Defendant:
Direct 2 Home LLC, D, Bradley Pereira and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon L Callier
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
