Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Staszczuk v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2024cv00352
Plaintiff:
Agnieszka Ciezkal Staszczuk
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M. Jaddou, Troy A. Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01162
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Ricardo Jackson v. P. Covello, et al
as 20-55284
Defendant / Appellee:
ANDERSON, Sergeant, GARCIA, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICARDO JACKSON
Michael Moreno Bey v. City of Chicago, et al
as 19-3451
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF ILLINOIS, A. R. FLORES, J. R. LENSKI and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL MORENO BEY
Juan Sapeg v. The Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., et al
as 19-10992
Defendant / Appellee:
ALEX CALDERON, RICCHARD JOHANNESSEN, THE HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JUAN JOSE SAPEG
Kevin Jones v. LAC Warden, et al
as 19-55115
Defendant / Appellee:
LAC WARDEN, (CDCR), LAC CHIEF PSYCHOLOGIST, (CDCR), R. FLORES, (CDCR) CCI Counselor and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN WALKER JONES
Fulcher v. Secretary of Veterans Affairs
as 17-1460
Amicus Curiae:
CITY OF ROCHESTER, NEW YORK, JOCELYN SAMUELS, NARAL PRO-CHOICE AMERICA and others
Petitioner:
GIULIANO SILVA, DEE FULCHER and TRANSGENDER AMERICAN VETERANS ASSOCIATION
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
Flores v. State Of Texas et al
as 5:2016cv00130
Plaintiff:
Manuel R Flores
Defendant:
State Of Texas and Greg Abbott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wolfson v. Brammer, et al
as 3:2008cv08064
Defendant:
Colleen Concannon, John Pressley Todd, Marion Weinzweig and others
Plaintiff:
Randolph Wolfson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flores et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as WVS/2:13-cv-15715
Plaintiff:
Peggy Flores and Arthur R. Flores
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
