Cases 1 - 10 of 8,379
WALLERSTEIN v. EXIT REALTY CORP INTERNATIONAL
as 1:2024cv01653
Plaintiff:
GREGORY WALLERSTEIN
Defendant:
EXIT REALTY CORP INTERNATIONAL
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Gunn v. Olaniyan et al
as 1:2024cv04657
Plaintiff:
Christopher Gunn
Defendant:
Olatokunbo Olaniyan, Estel Garcia, Elizabeth Geddes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Clark et al v. Mangham et al
as 5:2024cv00770
Plaintiff:
Mr & Mrs Larry E Clark and L & M Hair Care Products Inc
Defendant:
Mangham Hardy Rolfs & Abadie, Terrence J Donahue, Sr, Charles McBride and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Carl Puckett, Jr., et al v. Ain Jeem, Inc., et al
as 24-5537
Plaintiff:
CARL ELLEN PUCKETT, JR. and MARCELLA PUCKETT
Defendant:
AIN JEEM, INC., CHRIS STAVRO, DEBORAH MORALES and others
Mogan v. State Bar of California, et al.
as 24-3492
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MOGAN, ATTORNEY
Defendant:
STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, GEORGE CARDONA, in his official capacity as Chief Trial Counsel For the State Bar of California, and in his individual capacity, CHRISTOPHER JAGARD, in his official capacity as Deputy Chief Trial Counsel for the Office of the Chief Trial Counsel and in his individual capacity and others
Mastriano v. Gregory et al
as 5:2024cv00567
Plaintiff:
Douglas Mastriano
Defendant:
James Gregory, III, Roland Kuhn, Paul Mazerolle and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Ly v. Gelsinger et al
as 1:2024cv00651
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Ly
Defendant:
Pat Gelsinger, David Zinsner, James Goetz and others
CARTHAN et al v. USA
as 1:2024cv00834
Plaintiff:
BILLY CARTHAN, DAVIS DENTON, CLAY GRAHAM and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Rhodes v. U.S. Internal Revenue Service
as 2:2024cv00662
Plaintiff:
Gregory P Rhodes
Defendant:
U.S. Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
