Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Hall v. Metrofibernet, LLC et al
as 5:2024cv00334
Plaintiff:
Eric Kendall Hall
Defendant:
Metrofibernet, LLC d/b/a Metronet, CMN-RUS, LLC d/b/a Metronet and Metronet Securitization Warehouse Borrower, LLC d/b/a Metronet
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
BRYANT v. STEIN et al
as 1:2023cv00077
Plaintiff:
AMY BRYANT, M.D.
Defendant:
JOSHUA H. STEIN, JEFF NIEMAN, KODY H. KINSLEY and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Timothy K. Moore and Philip E. Berger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00124
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00325
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Willis v. Eastern Carolina Heart Institute et al
as 4:2017mc00004
Plaintiff:
Daniel J. Willis
Defendant:
Eastern Carolina Heart Institute, Donna Edwards, Cottina Goddard and others
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT v. HALL
as 1:2017mc00023
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Defendant:
JEANNE P. HALL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01395
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Hall, et al v. Levinson, et al
as 4:2016cv00224
Plaintiff:
Ozie L. Hall and Anderson Creek Club Charter School, Inc.
Defendant:
David N Levinson , Steven J Shotz , Marilyn Levinson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
COMMON CAUSE et al v. RUCHO et al
as 1:2016cv01026
Plaintiff:
COMMON CAUSE , NORTH CAROLINA DEMOCRATIC PARTY , LARRY D. HALL and others
Defendant:
ROBERT A. RUCHO, DAVID R. LEWIS, PHILIP E. BERGER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
SunEnergy1, LLC v. Hall
as 3:2015mc00088
Respondent:
Janna Hall
Petitioner:
SunEnergy1, LLC
Movant:
Robert W. Taylor
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
