Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Alma Garcia-Melgar, et al v. Merrick Garland
as 24-3276
Petitioner:
ALMA YESSICA GARCIA-MELGAR and ANGEL SANTIAGO GARCIA-MELGAR
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Juarez De La Rosa v. Alonso
as 4:2024cv00059
Petitioner:
Nidia DelCarmen Juarez De La Rosa
Defendant:
Angel Santiago Alonso
Guardian Ad Litem:
Camille M. Knight
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 11603 International Child Abduction Remedies
Martinez-Castillo, et al. v. Garland
as 23-4417
Petitioner:
KATHERINE PAOLA MARTINEZ-CASTILLO, ANGEL SANTIAGO SOLORZANO-MARTINEZ, ANGEL GAEL SOLORZANO-MARTINEZ and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ramiro Rivera v. Merrick Garland
as 22-3830
Petitioner:
RAMIRO ANGEL SANTIAGO RIVERA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Santiago-Mateo v. Garland
as 21-632
Petitioner:
MANUEL ANGEL SANTIAGO-MATEO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Angel Lopez-Santiago v. William Barr
as 20-72095
Petitioner:
ANGEL LOPEZ-SANTIAGO, AKA Sergio Hernandez-Ruiz, AKA Angel Santiago Lopez
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
United States of America v. Guzman (Rivera)
as 17-3079
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Miguel Guzman, AKA Mipo, Rolondo Lorenzo, AKA Orlando, Gregory Ayala, AKA Greggo and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Edwin Rivera, AKA Deadeye, AKA Eduar
Sharodd Hargrove v. Angel Santiago, et al
as 16-8039
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
SHARODD HARGROVE
Defendant - Respondent:
ANGEL SANTIAGO, LT. JONES, SGT. SALANCHO and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00153
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
SANTIAGO et al v. INSPIRA HEALTH NETWORK, INC. et al
as NJ/2:14-cv-05858
Plaintiff:
JASMINE A. SANTIAGO and ANGEL SANTIAGO
Defendant:
INSPIRA HEALTH NETWORK, INC. , INSPIRA MEDICAL CENTERS, INC. , PREMIER ORTHOPAEDIC AND SPORTS MEDICINE ASSOCIATES OF SOUTH JERSEY, LLC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
