Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Andrew Mitchell, et al v. Cty of Cincinnati, OH, et al
as 21-4061
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDREW MITCHELL and DAVID SCHOFIELD
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF CINCINNATI, OH and MAYOR JOHN CRANLEY
Intervenor / Appellee:
BRIAN NORRIS
Sherry Dow v. Debbie Stabenow, et al
as 21-5005
Defendant / Appellee:
Fairchild Airforce Base, Central Intelligence Agency, United Nations and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Sherry Lynn Dow
USA v. Andrew Mitchell, Jr.
as 21-10060
Defendant / Appellant:
ANDREW MITCHELL, JR.
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Andrew Berry, et al v. CIR
as 19-70709
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANDREW MITCHELL BERRY and SARA BERRY
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Anderson et al v. DIRECTV, LLC et al
as 2:2016mc01490
Plaintiff:
Sefton Anderson , Christopher Barnhart , Dean Bourn and others
Defendant:
DIRECTV LLC, Directv, Inc and Mastec North America, Inc.
Respondent:
Advanced Cable and Satellite LLC
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Anderson et al v. DIRECTV, LLC et al
as 1:2016mc00019
Plaintiff:
Sefton Anderson , Christopher Barnhart , Dean Bourn and others
Defendant:
DIRECTV, LLC, DIRECTV, INC. and Mastec North America, Inc.
Respondent:
Advanced Cable and Satellite LLC
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
In Re: Paul Mitchell
as 14-3794
Petitioner:
In re: Paul Andrew Mitchell, also known as Mitchell Paul Modeleski
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv03837
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692
In re: Modeleski
as 14-8081
Petitioner:
MITCHELL PAUL MODELESKI, AKA Paul Andrew Mitchell
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Battle et al v. DIRECTV, Inc et al
as ALS/1:14-cv-02007
Plaintiff:
Kris Battle , Russell Blakely , Rodney Bridges and others
Defendant:
DIRECTV, Inc and DIRECTV, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
