Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Builder Services Group, Inc. v. Dillon et al
as 2:2024cv04092
Plaintiff:
Builder Services Group, Inc.
Defendant:
Lonnie Dillon, Lake Residential Commercial Insulation, LLC and Goley Insulation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Builder Services Group, Inc. v. Riley et al
as 1:2023cv04530
Plaintiff:
Builder Services Group, Inc.
Defendant:
Steven Franklin Riley, Tracie Riley, Steven Christian Riley and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Architectural Design Contract v. Builder Services Group, Inc.
as 21-56290
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN CONTRACTORS, INC., a California corporation (substituted as Plaintiff per docket no. 49) Substituted for Temcula M.O.B., LLC
Defendant / Appellant:
BUILDER SERVICES GROUP, INC., a Florida corporation as the successor to TRUTEAM OF CALIFORNIA, INC., a California corporation
Builder Services Group Inc v. ICI Construction Inc
as 3:2015cv02127
Plaintiff:
Builder Services Group Inc
Defendant:
ICI Construction Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Construction 70. Inc. v. Hallcraft SRC, LLC et al
as 2:2010cv00594
Plaintiff:
Construction 70, Inc.
Defendant:
Hallcraft SRC, LLC , Hallcraft Construction, Inc., Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and others
Cross_claimant:
Floorworks, Inc. , Poco Verde Landscape, Inc. and Metric Roofing, Inc.
Cross_defendant:
Unknown Parties, Metric Roofing, Inc. , AmTrust Bank and others
Counter_claimant:
Floorworks, Inc. , Poco Verde Landscape, Inc. and Metric Roofing, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Construction 70, Inc. , AmTrust Financial Services, Inc., Builder Services Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819
Gibson v. Builder Services Group, Inc.
as 8:2009cv00832
Plaintiff:
Gary Gibson
Defendant:
Builder Services Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
