Cases 1 - 10 of 49
Northern Virginia Hemp v. Commonwealth of VA
as 23-2192
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NORTHERN VIRGINIA HEMP AND AGRICULTURE, LLC, ROSE LANE and FRANNY'S OPERATIONS, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, GLENN YOUNGKIN, Governor of the Commonwealth of Virginia, in his official capacity, JASON S. MIYARES, Attorney General for the Commonwealth of Virginia, in his official capacity and others
Northern Virginia Hemp and Agriculture, LLC et al v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 1:2023cv01177
Plaintiff:
Northern Virginia Hemp and Agriculture, LLC, Rose Lane and Franny's Operations, Inc.
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia, Glenn Youngkin, Jason S. Miyares and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0554 Constitutionality of State Statutes
Center for Biological Diversity et al v. Little et al
as 1:2021cv00479
Plaintiff:
Center for Biological Diversity, Friends of the Clearwater, Gallatin Wildlife Association and others
Defendant:
Governor of Idaho Brad Little, Dir., ID F&G Ed Schriever, Derick Attebury and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538
United States of America v. Busch (Delgado)
as 21-2294
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Cody Busch, Tony Peebles, AKA Tone, Kyle Eagan, AKA Bow Wow and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Jonathan Delgado, AKA Jmag
In re: Lafawn Bobbitt
as 21-1894
Petitioner:
In re: LAFAWN DEWAYNE BOBBITT, a/k/a Mandingo, a/k/a Dingo
US v. Lafawn Bobbitt
as 21-7187
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
LAFAWN DEWAYNE BOBBITT, a/k/a Mandingo, a/k/a Dingo
Philip Bobbitt v. Milberg LLP, et al
as 21-80060
Petitioner:
RONALD A. UITZ, MELVYN I. WEISS, ANDREW LUSTIGMAN and others
Respondent:
PHILIP BOBBITT
Daniel Cobble v. Commissioner of G.D.C., et al
as 21-11844
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF THE GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and TREVONZA BOBBITT
Petitioner / Appellant:
DANIEL ERIC COBBLE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
