Cases 1 - 10 of 12
De Botton v. Quality Loan Service Corporation of Washington, et al.
as 24-2738
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND DE BOTTON
Defendant:
QUALITY LOAN SERVICE CORPORATION OF WASHINGTON, MCCARTHY & HOLTHUS, LLP, WARREN LANCE and others
De Botton, et al. v. Quality Loan Service Corporation, et al.
as 23-3509
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAYMOND DE BOTTON and SCOTT ERIK STAFNE, Counsel for Plaintiff
Defendant / Appellee:
QUALITY LOAN SERVICE CORPORATION, of Washington, MCCARTHY & HOLTHUS, LLP, WARREN LANCE and others
Raymond De Botton v. Quality Loan Service Corporation of Washington, et al
as 23-35337
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAYMOND DE BOTTON
Defendant / Appellee:
QUALITY LOAN SERVICE CORPORATION OF WASHINGTON, MCCARTHY & HOLTHUS, LLP, WARREN LANCE and others
De Botton v. Quality Loan Service Corporation of Washington et al
as 2:2023cv00223
Plaintiff:
Raymond De Botton
Defendant:
Quality Loan Service Corporation of Washington, McCarthy & Holthus, LLP, Warren Lance and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Fraud
Bottone v. Roche et al
as 1:2022cv10349
Plaintiff:
Robert Bottone
Defendant:
David Roche, Sivin, Miller & Roche LLP, Alexis El Sayed and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
USA v. Alfredo Ruiz
as 22-13284
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ALFREDO BOTTON RUIZ
Botton v. The Brachfeld Law Group, a Professional Corporation
as 7:2012cv04046
Plaintiff:
David Botton
Defendant:
The Brachfeld Law Group, a Professional Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Bottone v. United States of America
as 11-4546
Petitioner:
Alfred V. Bottone, Jr., Prisoner
Respondent:
United States of America
BOTTON v. NESS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv03950
Plaintiff:
NISSIM BOTTON
Defendant:
NESS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. , AHARON FOGEL, AJIT BHUSHAN and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
