Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Maurice Sinkfield v. US
as 21-6385
Defendant / Appellee:
A. JOHNSON, Lieutenant, T. BROOKS, Officer, C. HAMILTON, Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAURICE J. SINKFIELD
Kevin Rodrigues v. Lieutenant C. Hamilton
as 21-6278
Defendant / Appellee:
LIEUTENANT BOWLES, OFFICER SMALLWOOD, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER C. LAWSON and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN RODRIGUES
Estate of Louis Charles Hamilton II et al v. Trump et al
as 1:2020cv00266
Defendant:
United States Congress, Donald John Trump, Sr, United Nations and others
Plaintiff:
Louis Charles Hamilton, II, Emma Watson, Henry Charles Albert David and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00644
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Arthur Hamilton v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., et al
as 19-17456
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ARTHUR C. HAMILTON
Defendant / Appellee:
SHIRLEY FRANKLIN, OLD REPUBLIC DEFAULT MANAGEMENT SERVICES and JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Arthur Hamilton v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., et al
as 19-17219
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ARTHUR C. HAMILTON
Defendant / Appellee:
SHIRLEY FRANKLIN, OLD REPUBLIC DEFAULT MANAGEMENT SERVICES and JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Parshall v. National Commerce Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv00379
Defendant:
Stephen A. Sevigny, Temple W. Tutwiler, III, Thomas H. Coley and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Parshall
Bushansky v. National Commerce Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv00355
Defendant:
Stephen A. Sevigny, Temple W. Tutwiler, III, Thomas H. Coley and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Bushansky
Hamilton, et al v. CIR
as 19-9000
Petitioner / Appellant:
STEPHANIE HAMILTON and VINCENT C. HAMILTON
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2017cv02468
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
