Cases 1 - 10 of 17,560
Weber v. Nextracker Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv09467
Defendant:
David Bennett, Charles Boynton, Daniel Shugar and others
Plaintiff:
Mariel Weber
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
United States of America v. Smith
as 24-7723
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
MICHAEL CHARLES SMITH
USA v. Charles Pettigrew, III
as 24-6142
Defendant:
CHARLES E. PETTIGREW, III
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Mills v. New York City, New York
as 24-3308
Defendant:
NEW YORK CITY, New York
Plaintiff:
CRAIG SOTOMAYOR, CHARLES MILLS and BRADEN HOLLIDAY
United States of America v. Heard
as 24-7665
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
Cheese and CHARLES HEARD
U.S. DOMINION, INC. et al v. HERRING NETWORKS. INC. et al
as 1:2024mc00162
Defendant:
CHARLES HERRING, CHANEL RION, ROBERT HERRING, SR. and others
Plaintiff:
DOMINION VOTING SYSTEMS, INC., US DOMINION, INC. and DOMINION VOTING SYSTEMS CORPORATION
Respondent:
SMARTMATIC USA CORP.
Cause Of Action: Motion to Enforce Subpoena
Petteway v. Connecticut Department of Corrections
as 24-3278
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER DEVEAU, CHRISTOPHER Q. PETTEWAY, BREWSHAWN THOMAS-BAKER and others
Defendant:
CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Which includes, but may not be limited to The Conn State Department Public Health; Securs TECH. Inc; Unity Products, LLC; The United States Post Office Post Master Gomaps, CRAIG WASHINGTON, Warden, Individual and Official Capacity, ANGEL QUIROS, Commissioner of Corrections, Individual and Official Capacity and others
STEBBINS v. BRAUNSTEIN et al
as 2:2024cv06705
Defendant:
Joseph Hulihan, CHARLES AUSTIN, STEVEN PFANSTIEL and others
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS STEBBINS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2024cv04961
Plaintiff:
Charles Schwab & Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836 (b) Civil Action to Protect Trade Secrets
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
