Cases 1 - 10 of 48
In re: Carper
as 23-1378
Petitioner:
In re: JULIE CARPER
Respondent:
DOUGLAS PETERSON, SHAWN EATHERTON and SHARON K. MAULER
DeJuan Thornton-BeyIn re: DeJuan Thornton-Bey
as 23-2057
Petitioner:
In re: DEJUAN B. THORNTON-BEY
Respondent:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, WARDEN D. CHRISTENSEN, C.O. B. FOGLEMAN and others
Mary-Lisa Guillaume et al v. Fight Age Labs, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv09289
Plaintiff:
Mary-Lisa Guillaume, Ryan Artolachipe, Jessica Carmello and others
Defendant:
Fight Age Labs, LLC, Phytage Labs LLC and Does 1 through 100, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Mary-Lisa Guillaume et al v. Fight Age Labs, LLC et al
as 5:2021cv01995
Plaintiff:
Mary-Lisa Guillaume, Ryan Artolachipe, JESSICA CARMELLO and others
Defendant:
FIGHT AGE LABS, LLC, PHYTAGE LABS LLC and Does 1 through 100, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
LS3 Inc. v. Cherokee Nation Strategic Programs, et al
as 21-1385
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LS3 INC., a Maryland corporation
Defendant / Appellee:
CHEROKEE NATION STRATEGIC PROGRAMS, L.L.C., an Oklahoma limited liability company, CHEROKEE FEDERAL SOLUTIONS, L.L.C., an Oklahoma limited liability company, CHEROKEE SERVICES GROUP, LLC, a Cherokee Nation limited liability company and others
Carper v. TMC the metals company Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv05991
Plaintiff:
Bruce Carper
Defendant:
TMC the metals company Inc., Gerard Barron and Scott Leonard
Ronald Cosner v. Dr. Thistlethwaite
as 21-7250
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD L. COSNER
Defendant / Appellee:
DR. THISTLETHWAITE, JOSHUA SHREWSBERY, SANDRA MAY and others
Defendant:
PSIMED, INC., WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC. and MOUNT OLIVE CORRECTIONAL COMPLEX
Bullock v. United States Postal Service et al
as 4:2020cv00079
Defendant:
Louis DeJoy and United States Postal Service
Plaintiff:
Steve Bullock
Amicus Curiae:
Ron Wyden, Thomas R. Carper, Tammy Duckworth and others
Cause Of Action: 39 U.S.C. § 409
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
