Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Cluse v. Rowden, et al.
as 24-2045
Plaintiff:
DANIEL WILLIAM CLUSE
Defendant:
TRAVIS JAMES ROWDEN, in his individual and official capacities, COUNTY OF COCONINO and JIM DRISCOLL, Sheriff
United States of America v. Boykin (Brice)
as 21-2794
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Anthony Boykin, AKA Double O, Paul Arline, AKA Face, Joshua Arnold and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Anthony Brice, AKA Reack
US v. Daniel Williams
as 21-6945
Defendant / Appellant:
DANIEL WILLIAMS
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Daniel Rudd v. Gregory Pittman
as 21-1354
Defendant / Appellee:
GREGORY C. PITTMAN, Judge
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL WILLIAM RUDD
Christopher Ivey v. Daniel Williams, et al
as 20-2405
Defendant / Appellee:
Daniel Williams, William Gullickson, Scott Giannini and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Christopher Ivey
Jon White v. Daniel Strong, et al
as 19-55735
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JON ASTOR WHITE, an individual
Defendant / Appellee:
DANIEL WILLIAM STRONG, AKA Strong, LEE DANIELS, TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY FOX, INC. and others
Daniel Rudd v. City of Norton Shores, et al
as 19-1226
Defendant / Appellee:
MELISSA MEYERS, Attorney, individually and acting on behalf of her law firm, CITY OF NORTON SHORES, MATTHEW RHYNDRESS, Sergeant, individually and in his official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL WILLIAM RUDD
Williams v. Wyndham Rewards, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv05783
Plaintiff:
Daniel Williams
Defendant:
Wyndham Rewards, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Williams v. Cogzidel Corporation
as 1:2018cv04577
Plaintiff:
Daniel Williams
Defendant:
Cogzidel Corporation
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
United States of America v. Fisher (Clinton)
as 18-1417
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Marcus Fisher, AKA Fish, Romell Hearn, AKA Rah, AKA Mel, Recardo Langston, AKA Geezy and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Jamal Clinton, AKA Moreless
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
