Cases 1 - 10 of 60
Hernandez-Romero v. Garland
as 24-9535
Petitioner:
JOSE DANIEL HERNANDEZ-ROMERO
Respondent:
MERRICK GARLAND, Attorney General
USA v. Martinez
as 24-10337
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Daniel Hernandez Martinez
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt v. Knights Templar Commandery et al
as 5:2024cv00033
Defendant:
Fredro Starr, Knights Tempar Commandery Zone 12, Southgate, CA and others
Plaintiff:
Victoria Tenisha Dillihunt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hernandez-Yanes, et al. v. Garland
as 23-4006
Petitioner:
FRANCIS DANIEL HERNANDEZ-YANES, ROSA RIVAS-RETANA and DANIEL ANTONIO HERNANDEZ-RIVAS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Hernandez-Hernandez v. Garland
as 23-7314
Petitioner:
MILTON DANIEL HERNANDEZ-HERNANDEZ, LIGIA MARIELA MOPOSITA-YANCHATUNA and STEPHEN DANIEL HERNANDEZ-MOPOSITA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Hernandez v. Miami Automotive Retail, Inc.
as 1:2022cv23958
Plaintiff:
Daniel Hernandez
Defendant:
Miami Automotive Retail, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
United States v. Hernandez
as 22-2083
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DANIEL HERNANDEZ
USA v. Hernandez
as 22-10393
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Daniel Hernandez
US v. Hernandez-Osorio
as 22-1260
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
HECTOR DANIEL HERNANDEZ-OSORIO, a/k/a Cachete, a/k/a Cachete el Flaco
Estate of Daniel Hernandez, et al v. City of Los Angeles, et al
as 21-55994
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ESTATE OF DANIEL HERNANDEZ, by and through successors in interest, Manuel Hernandez, Maria Hernandez and M.L.H., MANUEL HERNANDEZ, individually and MARIA HERNANDEZ, individually
Plaintiff:
M. L. H., a minor, by and through her guardian ad litem Claudia Sugey Chavez
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, LOS ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT and TONI MCBRIDE
Defendant:
DOES, 1 to 10
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
