Cases 1 - 10 of 3,405
In Re: Rachel Genevieve Powers Trust v. Webb
as 24-1318
Appellant:
RACHEL GENEVIEVE POWERS, Trust
Defendant:
JEREMIAH DARNELL WEBB, NOAH SENCER ROBERT BARCLAY, MALAKAI LEVI LYNCH and others
Fucci, et al v. First American Title Insurance Company, et al
as 24-4051
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER C. FUCCI, an individual, AMBLESIDE PARK, a New Hampshire corporation, RICHARD HARDER, trustee of the Richard and Susan Harder Living Trust and others
Defendant:
FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Nebraska Corporation, KIRSTEN PARKIN, an individual, WILLIAM BOWSER, an individual and others
KOSTUCH v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00737
Petitioner:
DONNA KOSTUCH
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Forsythe v. McDonough
as 24-1795
Claimant:
DONNA J. FORSYTHE
Respondent:
DENIS MCDONOUGH, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00869
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
Ward v. Bonta et al
as 3:2024cv00769
Plaintiff:
Thomas Ward
Defendant:
Attorney General Rob Bonta, Donna Ward and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
MARIN v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00591
Petitioner:
DONNA MARIN
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Hager, et al. v. United States of America
as 24-2184
Plaintiff:
SARAH HAGER, on behalf of herself and on behalf of statutory beneficiaries of Edward Michael Hager, A.H, E.H. Jr., T.H and DONNA FETT
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Donna Fecundo
as 24-1618
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
DONNA M. FECUNDO, also known as DONNA SILVESTRI FECUNDO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
