Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Robertson v. Janoski-Haehlen et al
as 5:2022cv01652
Plaintiff:
Clark A. Robertson
Defendant:
Emily Janoski-Haehlen, Christopher J. Peters, Charles Oldfield and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
American Energy, LLC v. DOWCP
as 22-1740
Petitioner:
AMERICAN ENERGY, LLC and ROCKWOOD CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Respondent:
DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and CANDITA GOODE, o/b/o The Estate of Bruce E. Goode
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Good
as 7:2022cv00060
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Shawn E. Good
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Clark Robertson v. Univ of Akron School of Law, et al
as 21-3768
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLARK A. ROBERTSON
Defendant / Appellee:
UNIVERSITY OF AKRON SCHOOL OF LAW, DEAN CHRISTOPHER J. PETERS, University of Akron School of Law, ASSIST. DEAN CHARLES WAYNE OLDFIELD, University of Akron School of Law and others
Rasheed Burley v. Mike Williams, et al
as 21-12479
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RASHEED AKEEM BURLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
MIKE WILLIAMS, Sheriff, JOHN E. GOODE, Duval County Jail, TAMMY MORRIS and others
USA v. Charles Goode, Jr.
as 19-4169
Defendant / Appellant:
CHARLES E. GOODE, JR.
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Goode et al v. County Waste of Virginia, LLC
as 3:2014mc00002
Plaintiff:
Douglas E. Goode, Sr. , George T. Hodges , Kelvin Jones and others
Defendant:
County Waste of Virginia, LLC
Goods v. Housing Authority of Baltimore City
as 1:2010cv02293
Plaintiff:
Daron E. Goods
Defendant:
Housing Authority of Baltimore City
Movant:
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development and United States of America
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
US v. James E. Goode
as 07-4852
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMES E. GOODE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
