Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Koklich, et al. v. Borders, et al.
as 24-3505
Plaintiff: BRUCE KOKLICH, individually and as Class Representatives, HAROLD W. TAYLOR, DAVID M. ZIEMKE and others
Defendant: DEAN BORDERS, Warden and Senior Administrative and Policy making Officer, individual and official capacity and CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, a California Public Entity
Fantastic Sams Franchise Corporation v. LarkSimple, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv10863
Petitioner: Fantastic Sams Franchise Corporation
Respondent: LarkSimple, LLC and Warren E. Austin
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Loan
Austin v. US
as 19-1419
Respondent: TIMOTHY STEWART, Warden, FCI Cumberland and UNITED STATES
Petitioner: CHAD E. AUSTIN
AUSTIN v. EQUIFAX, INC. et al
as PAE/2:17-cv-04045
Plaintiff: MICHELLE E. AUSTIN and Barbara J. Hensley
Defendant: EQUIFAX, INC. and EQUIFAX CREDIT INFORMATION SERVICES, INC.
AUSTIN v. EQUIFAX, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv04045
Plaintiff: MICHELLE E. AUSTIN
Defendant: EQUIFAX, INC. and EQUIFAX CREDIT INFORMATION SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
State Farm Insurance Co v. Austin et al
as 1:2017cv05259
Plaintiff: State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Defendant: Donald E. Austin and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Justice et al v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as CAN/3:14-cv-00259
Plaintiff: Zelda Justice , Carolyn Lewis , Gaetano Lococo and others
Defendant: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company , Sanofi-Aventis U.S. Inc. , Sanofi-Synthelabo Inc. and others
US v. Austin
as 13-1485
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant: CHAD E. AUSTIN
Jarrett v. Austin
as 1:2012mi00169
Plaintiff: Alex Jarrett
Defendant: Paul E. Austin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1963
v. AUSTIN
as 8:2009mc00110
Respondent: CHARLES E. AUSTIN

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?