Cases 1 - 10 of 26
United States of America v. Sullivan
as 2:2023cv01095
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Gerald E. Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Recovery of Debt to US
OptumRX Inc. v. Maurice E Sullivan
as 8:2022cv00633
Petitioner:
OptumRX Inc.
Respondent:
Maurice E Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0001 U.S. Arbitration Act
Lawrence v. CyrusOne Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00406
Plaintiff:
Richard Lawrence
Defendant:
CyrusOne Inc., David H. Ferdman, Lynn A. Wentworth and others
WILSON v. CYRUSONE INC. et al
as 2:2022cv00178
Plaintiff:
JORDAN WILSON
Defendant:
CYRUSONE INC., ALEX SHUMATE, DAVID H FERDMAN and others
WATERMAN v. CYRUSONE INC. et al
as 2:2022cv00167
Plaintiff:
MARC WATERMAN
Defendant:
CYRUSONE INC., LYNN A WENTWORTH, ALEX SHUMATE and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
COFFMAN v. CYRUSONE INC. et al
as 2:2022cv00140
Plaintiff:
CATHERINE COFFMAN
Defendant:
CYRUSONE INC., ALEX SHUMATE, DAVID H FERDMAN and others
Ciccotelli v. CyrusOne Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00145
Plaintiff:
Alex Ciccotelli
Defendant:
CyrusOne Inc., Lynn A. Wentworth, Alex Shumate and others
Jeewa v. CyrusOne, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00064
Plaintiff:
Mo Jeewa
Defendant:
CyrusOne, Inc., Lynn A. Wentworth, Alex Shumate and others
O'Dell v. CyrusOne, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00016
Plaintiff:
Ryan O'Dell
Defendant:
CyrusOne, Inc., Lynn A. Wentworth, Alex Shumate and others
Yuri Stoyanov v. Carlos Del Toro
as 21-2222
Plaintiff / Appellant:
YURI J. STOYANOV
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES H. KING, Individually and in his Official Capacity as the Head of Code 70 Carderock Division Naval Surface Warfare Center, KEVIN M. WILSON, Individually and in his Official Capacity as the Head of Code 74 Carderock Division Naval Surface Warfare Center, DAVID L. MAYO, Individually and in his Official Capacity as the Head of Code 743 Carderock Division Naval Surface Warfare Center and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
