Cases 1 - 10 of 607
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01946
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00309
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Ctrl Alt Destroy, Inc. v. Elliot et al
as 3:2024cv00753
Plaintiff:
Ctrl Alt Destroy, Inc.
Defendant:
Nicole Elliot, Rob Bonta and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0151 Labor: National Labor Relations Act (NLRA)
OFORI-AFRIFRA v. BLINKEN et al
as 2:2024cv00910
Plaintiff:
EMMANUEL OFORI-AFRIFRA
Defendant:
ANTONY BLINKEN, RENA BITTER, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
The Weatherby Group LLC v. TriStar Manufacturing, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00424
Plaintiff:
The Weatherby Group LLC
Defendant:
TriStar Manufacturing, Inc. and Kyle Elliot
Smerling v. United States of America
as 24-854
Plaintiff:
ELLIOT SMERLING, AKA Sealed Defendant 1
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Kessler v. Tri State Motor Transit Co. et al
as 6:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
Justin D. Kessler and Justin Dewayne Kessler
Defendant:
Tri State Motor Transit Co., Daniel Stark, Ruth Green and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Smerling v. United States of America
as 24-649
Plaintiff:
ELLIOT SMERLING
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
IN RE FARFETCH LIMITED SECURITIES LITIGATION
as 1:2023cv10982
Plaintiff:
Jasmine Wu and Michael Ragan
Petitioner:
Dr. Michael Bievetski, Eduardo Archer Veloso Martins, Renoporto-Investimentos Imobiliarios, LDA and others
Defendant:
Farfetch Limited, Jos Neves, Elliot Jordan and others
Ragan v. Farfetch Limited et al
as 1:2024cv00532
Plaintiff:
Michael Ragan, Tamim Altamimi, Fernando Sulichin and others
Petitioner:
KAUNDRIA WEST and Eduardo Archer Veloso Martins
Defendant:
Farfetch Limited, Jose Neves, Elliot Jordan and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
