Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Mirman v. Executive Risk Indemnity, Inc.
as 19-1757
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Abraham "Avi" Mirman
Defendant / Appellee:
Executive Risk Indemnity, Inc.
Fader v. Executive Risk Indemnity, Inc.
as 1:2016cv12569
Plaintiff:
Stacy Fader
Defendant:
Executive Risk Indemnity, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1442
Air & Liquid Systems Corp et al v. Allianz Underwriters Insurance Co. et al
as 3:2012mc00051
Plaintiff:
Air & Liquid Systems Corp and Ampco-Pittsburgh Corp.
Defendant:
Allianz Underwriters Insurance Co., Allstate Insurance Company, Assicurazioni Generali S.P.A. and others
Counter_claimant:
Howden North America, Inc.
Cross_claimant:
Howden North America, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corp, Ampco-Pittsburgh Corp., Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London and others
Cross_defendant:
Allianz Underwriters Insurance Co., Northbrook Excess and Surplus Insurance Co., American Ins Co and others
Movant:
General Reinsurance Corporation
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Type:
Other Statutes
EXECUTIVE RISK INDEMNITY INC. v. WOOD
as 3:2008cv00356
Petitioner:
EXECUTIVE RISK INDEMNITY INC.
Respondent:
MARK G. WOOD
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Brian F. Leonard, et al v. Executive Risk Indemnity
as 07-1335
Debtor:
In re: SRC Holding Corp., formerly known as Miller & Schroeder, Inc., and its subsidiaries
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Brian F. Leonard, Trustee
Defendant - Appellant:
Executive Risk Indemnity, Inc.
Intervenor Below - Appellee:
The Marshall Group, Jerome A. Tabolich, James E. Iverson and others
Brian F. Leonard, et al v. Executive Risk Indemnity
as 07-1327
Debtor:
In re: SRC Holding Corp., formerly known as Miller & Schroeder, Inc., and its subsidiaries
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Brian F. Leonard, Trustee
Defendant - Appellant:
Executive Risk Indemnity, Inc.
Intervenor Below - Appellee:
The Marshall Group, Jerome A. Tabolich, James E. Iverson and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
