Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Wright v. Gold et al
as 1:2020cv01639
Defendant:
William D. Rueckert, Daniel P. Gold, Thomas C. Reynolds and others
Nominal Defendant:
MEI Pharma, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Gerald Wright
In re: Gerald Wright
as 20-1875
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY DAUPHIN COUNTY
Petitioner:
In re: GERALD WRIGHT
USA v. Gerald Wright
as 19-14191
Defendant / Appellant:
GERALD WRIGHT
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In re: Gerald Wright
as 16-12798
Petitioner:
In re: GERALD WRIGHT
Successive Habeas Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States v. Gerald Wright
as 15-3906
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Gerald Wright
In re: Gerald Wright
as 13-2891
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: GERALD WRIGHT
Defendant - Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY DAUPHIN COUNTY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00106
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 521 Communications Act
Federal Trade Commission v. Goldman Schwartz Inc. et al
as 6:2013mc00011
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Defendant:
Goldman Schwartz Inc., Debtcom Inc., Harris County Check Recovery Inc. and others
Federal Trade Commission v. Goldman Schwartz Inc
as 3:2013mc00012
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Defendant:
Goldman Schwartz Inc, Debtcom Inc, Harris County Check Recovery Inc and others
Receiver:
Charlene C Koonce
Federal Trade Commission v. Goldman Schwartz Inc. et al
as 5:2013mc00066
Defendant:
Debtcom, Inc., Starlette Foster, Goldman Schwartz Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754 Receiver of Property in Different Districts
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
