Cases 1 - 10 of 93
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04117
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC. v. G AND C LICENSE LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00308
Plaintiff:
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC.
Defendant:
G AND C LICENSE LLC doing business as TAVERN & TABLE and GIUSEPPE CAMMARATA, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
Multari et al v. Fakhoury
as 5:2023cv00631
Plaintiff:
Barbara Lynn Multari and Franco Giuseppe Multari
Defendant:
Riadh Fakhoury
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
USA v. Alex Saab Moran
as 23-10066
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ALEX NAIN SAAB MORAN
Amicus Curiae:
SIR IVOR ROBERTS, KCMG, FCIL and others
Abraham et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11515
Plaintiff:
John Zimmerman, Daniel Jankowski, Alex Alvarado and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act of 1976
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03901
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Rabasca v. Siebel et al
as 4:2023cv01566
Plaintiff:
Giuseppe Rabasca
Defendant:
Thomas M. Siebel, Patricia A. House, Condoleezza Rice and others
Interested Party:
C3.ai, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
DiMalta v. BMW of North America, LLC
as 2:2023cv00190
Plaintiff:
Giuseppe DiMalta
Defendant:
BMW of North America, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
In Re: Veleno, et al
as 22-1794
Respondent:
RON MILLER, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, WILLIAM J. SULLIVAN, RAYMOND P. DOLAN and others
Petitioner:
GIUSEPPE VELENO and GARY WILLIAMS
Interested Party:
ARIE CARMELLI
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
