Cases 1 - 10 of 293
James v. State of California, et al.
as 24-7405
Defendant:
SACRAMENTO POLICE DEPARTMENT, DANIEL HAHN, JOSEPH THEBEAU and others
Plaintiff:
RONALD EUGENE JAMES
Tendick et al v. Vision Service Plan
as 1:2024cv12456
Defendant:
Vision Service Plan
Plaintiff:
Peter Hahn and Marianna Tendick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Silver v. County of Los Angeles, et al.
as 24-6852
Defendant:
LOS ANGELES COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, KATHRYN BARGER, 5th District Board of Supervisors County Los Angeles, KEITH KNOX, Los Angeles County Treasurer and Tax Collector and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTIAN DE LYS SILVER, an individual
Gregory Stenstrom, et alIn re: Gregory Stenstrom, et al
as 24-3076
Petitioner:
SEAN PATRICK CONNOLLY, SCOTT EDWIN THOMAS, KATHRYN BUCKLEY and others
Respondent:
DELAWARE COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, DELAWARE COUNTY COUNCIL, CHRISTINE REUTHER, in her individual capacity as a member of the Delaware County Council and others
:
PAUL RUMLEY
HAHN v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as PAE/2:24-cv-04325
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S and NOVO NORDISK INC.
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA PEYTON HAHN
Orozco v. Barger, et al.
as 24-4353
Defendant:
JANICE HAHN, ZEV YAROSLAVSKY, MICHAEL ANTONOVICH and others
Plaintiff:
HERNAN OROZCO
Few v. San Jose Police Dept. et al
as 1:2024cv03832
Plaintiff:
Jenessia Few
Defendant:
San Jose Police Dept., Cynthia Beltran-Hahn, Trent Tessler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Christian Silver v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2024cv00964
Plaintiff:
Christian Silver and Christian de Lys Silver
Defendant:
County of Los Angeles, Jeffrey Prang, Keith Knox and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Ajaero v. Obama
as 23-8117
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY J. AJAERO
Defendant / Appellee:
Former President BARACK OBAMA, HILLARY R. CLINTON, President JOE BIDEN and others
Defendant / Appellant:
NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT - 47TH PRECINCT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
