Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Crews v. Hiatt
as 2:2024cv02129
Plaintiff:
Jason Crews
Defendant:
Donald Hiatt
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Hafen v. Hiatt
as 2:2024cv00533
Defendant:
Rob Hiatt
Plaintiff:
Jonathan O. Hafen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1367 Other Property Damage
HIATT v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023vv01560
Petitioner:
DIANE M. HIATT
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Adee Honey Farms v. US
as 22-2105
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MONTEREY MUSHROOMS, INC.
Plaintiff:
ADEE HONEY FARMS, A. H. MEYER & SONS INC., MARK ALMETER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES, UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION and CHRISTOPHER MAGNUS, Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Patricia Morrison v. Quest Diagnostics Inc., et al
as 21-15277
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PATRICIA HARDING MORRISON
Defendant / Appellee:
MARGARET GOODMAN, Dr., MARC RATNER, NEVADA STATE ATHLETIC COMMISSION and others
Manisela Prescott v. USA, et al
as 20-56307
Defendant / Appellee:
BALTAZAR MAGANA, individual/official capacity, DOES, 1-10, individual/official capacity, CHERYL HIATT, Unit Manager individual/official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MANISELA V. PRESCOTT
Larsen v. Linthicum, et al
as 20-2016
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN HIATT, Penobscot County Treasurer, CARRIE L. LINTHICUM, Aroostook County Deputy District Attorney, REGINA LARSEN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD ALLEN LARSEN, III
Dawn Riddle, et al v. Indiana Department of Child Se, et al
as 20-2788
Defendant / Appellee:
LORI R. KING, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SERVICES, LYNDSAY KRAUTER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATT RIDDLE, individually and on behalf of K.R., M.R., and J.R. and DAWN RIDDLE, individually and on behalf of K.R., M.R., and J.R.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
