Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 2,104
Mercantile Global Holdings, Inc. v. Hamilton M&A Fund, SP
as 24-1528
Petitioner: MERCANTILE GLOBAL HOLDINGS, INC.
Respondent: HAMILTON M&A FUND, SP
Hamilton Reserve Bank Ltd. v. The Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka
as 24-1459
Plaintiff: HAMILTON RESERVE BANK LTD.
Intervenor: JESSE GUZMAN, ULTIMATE CONCRETE, LLC and INTERCOASTAL FINANCE LTD.
Defendant: THE DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF SRI LANKA
Shore United Bank, N.A. v. Tough et al
as 3:2024cv00370
Plaintiff: Shore United Bank, N.A.
Defendant: David G Tough, Neville B Tough, Pamela J. Hamilton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Interpleader Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00152
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03865
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Warren v. Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc.
as 8:2024cv01252
Plaintiff: Kelcy L. Warren
Defendant: Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7431 IRS: Unauthorized Disclosure of Return & Return Info
Langworthy v. Perky, et al.
as 24-2579
Plaintiff: GENEVA LANGWORTHY
Defendant: CAROLINA PERKY, LAURA HAMILTON, PABLO VILLARREAL and others
Hamilton v. Garland
as 24-980
Petitioner: VIVIAN SANDY HAMILTON
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
USA v. Rodney Higgins, Jr.
as 24-5331
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: RODNEY HAMILTON HIGGINS, JR., aka Rodney L. Higgins, aka Ermias Bey
Lawyers For Fair Reciprocal Admission v. United States of America, et al.
as 24-2213
Plaintiff: LAWYERS FOR FAIR RECIPROCAL ADMISSION
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL, MARY H. MURGUIA, CHIEF CIRCUIT JUDGE and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?