Cases 1 - 10 of 354
Santos v. Annikos, et al.
as 24-3730
Plaintiff:
RONALD R. SANTOS
Defendant:
KENNETH ANNIKOS, JOSEPH BENSON, N. BRITENBACK and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02574
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
SWARTZ v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2024cv01228
Plaintiff:
ROGER SWARTZ
Defendant:
JOE BIDEN, AMY GUTMANN, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Hartman v. First Bank, et al.
as 4:2024cv00285
Plaintiff:
Monica Hartman
Defendant:
Southern Hills Property Group
Garnishee:
First Bank
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Kiroska-Hartman v. Hartman
as 8:2023cv02974
Petitioner:
Cvetanka Kiroska-Hartman
Respondent:
Matthew Todd Hartman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 11601 International Child Abduction Remedies Act
Pattison v. Lombardo, et al.
as 24-478
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANTE H PATTISON
Defendant / Appellee:
JOE LOMBARDO, BRIAN SANDOVAL, STEVE SISOLAK and others
Knighton v. Hartman
as 24-45
Plaintiff / Appellee:
RAY ANTHONY KNIGHTON
Defendant:
NIGEL RODNEY, RN, K. PHILLIPS, RN, JANINE BRENNAN and others
Defendant / Appellant:
AMY HARTMAN, JOSHUA CLARK and NICHOLAS SULLIVAN
Silver Star Properties REIT, Inc. v. Hartman vREIT XXI, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv02720
Plaintiff:
Silver Star Properties REIT, Inc.
Defendant:
Hartman vREIY XXI, Inc., Allen R Hartman, Lisa Hartman and others
Morgan v. Hartman
as 23-7336
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL MORGAN
Defendant / Appellee:
SCOTT HARTMAN, MARIO MONELLO, VINCENT PUMA and others
Defendant:
THAE KWEON, THOMAS PINOU and ST. MARK'S WORLD ACQUISITIONS LLC
Formtec, LLC v. Spherical IP LLC et al
as 2:2023ms00072
Petitioner:
Formtec LLC
Respondent:
Spherical IP LLC
Intervenor Defendant:
Michael J. Morris and Bennett Hartman LLP
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
