Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Long v. Annucci
as 24-42
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VINCENT S. LONG
Defendant / Appellee:
ANTHONY J. ANNUCCI, Commissioner of New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervison, N. DOLDO, Superintendent; Cape Vincent Correctional Facility, M. NITSCHKE and others
Defendant:
M. MONTROY, Deputy Superintendent of Programs; Cape Vincent Correctional Facility, L. MOORE, L. SCHABER, Nurse Administrator; Cape Vincent Correctional Facility and others
US v. Ricky McLaughlin, Jr.
as 23-4493
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
RICKY JOHN MCLAUGHLIN, JR.
Elward et al v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
as 4:2018mc00007
Plaintiff:
Teresa Elward , Dennis Keesler , Leasa Brittenham and others
Defendant:
Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Movant:
Metro Builders Supply, Inc.
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv03265
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
CLARKE et al v. VOLKSWAGEN GROUP OF AMERICA, INC.
as NJ/2:15-cv-07549
Plaintiff:
AMY CLARKE , MARK GJONBALAJ , JOHN MCLAUGHLIN and others
Defendant:
VOLKSWAGEN GROUP OF AMERICA, INC. and VOLKSWAGEN AG
USA v. John McLaughlin
as 15-50537
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN NATHAN MCLAUGHLIN, also known as John McLaughlin
Doe v. McLaughlin
as 1:2014cv01023
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
John McLaughlin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Doe v. Alter et al
as 1:2013cv01548
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Matthew Alter, Nathan Arger, Frederick Mervin Bardell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
USA v. John McLaughlin
as 12-3255
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN MCLAUGHLIN, also known as SMOKEY, also known as MRMACLLDOO, also known as GOODDADDY, also know as CAPTAIN JACK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
