Cases 1 - 10 of 13
BLACK et al v. JAMES et al
as 1:2024cv00128
Defendant:
SOOMI JAMES, SUMI JAMES-BLACK, SUMI JAMES BLACK and others
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL P. BLACK, III, SAMUEL P. BLACK & ASSOCIATES D/B/A BLACK INSURANCE GROUP doing business as BLACK INSURANCE GROUP, ERIE MANAGEMENT GROUP, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Racketeering (RICO)
Stephen Yagman v. Cornell Companies Inc et al
as 2:2014cv07555
Defendant:
Sarah Marie Schuh, Kevin Louis Kincey, Wes J. Mayhew and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Yagman
Petitioner:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United States v. Black
as 15-3111
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMES BLACK
Doucette et al v. Directv, Inc. et al
as TNW/2:14-cv-02800
Plaintiff:
John Doucette, III , Farrell Flowers , James Maddox and others
Defendant:
Directv, Inc. , DirecTV, LLC and Multiband Corporation
Searles v. Board of Education
as 13-2005
Petitioner:
Suzanne Mersereau Searles
Respondent:
Paul Berkel, Natalie Schulman, Matthew Borrelli and others
Searles v. Board of Education
as 12-2452
Petitioner:
Suzanne Mersereau Searles
Respondent:
Board of Education, West Hartford, Paul Berkel, Natalie Schulman and others
Black et al v. DePuy International Limited et al
as OHN/1:12-dp-20831
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Black and James Black
Defendant:
DePuy International Limited , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and others
James Back v. CIR
as 11-73243
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES BLACK
Respondent - Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00365
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Searles v. Board of Education
as 10-1563
Petitioner:
Suzanne Mersereau Searles
Respondent:
Board of Education, West Hartford, Paul Berkel, Natalie Schulman and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
