Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Houston Municipal Employees Pension System, et al. v. Mattel, Inc., et al.
as 24-555
Plaintiff / Appellee:
HOUSTON MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES PENSION SYSTEM, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, DEKALB COUNTY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Lead Plaintiff and NEW ORLEANS EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM
Appellant:
JAMES HAYES
Defendant / Appellee:
MATTEL, INC., MARGARET H. GEORGIADIS, JOSEPH J. EUTENEUER and others
Purcell v. City of New York
as 23-7448
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROXANNE PURCELL, Estate of Garland Tyree Jr.
Plaintiff:
K.A.B. JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF NEW YORK, Sgt. ANTHONY LISI, Shield #4584, Det. SHAWN MCLAUGHLIN, Shield #7640 and others
Defendant:
COLLEEN KAVANAGH, Assistant United States Attorney, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, FIREARMS & EXPLOSIVES, JAMES HAYES, Lt. Fire Department of N.Y. Engine 158 and others
Smartmatic USA Corp. et al v. Conan James Hayes
as 2:2023mc00115
Plaintiff:
Smartmatic USA Corp., Smartmatic International Holding B.V. and SGO Corporation Limited
Defendant:
Conan James Hayes
USA v. Ryan Hayes
as 23-1589
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
RYAN JAMES HAYES
In Re: Hayes
as 23-8019
Respondent:
JAMES HAYES
Interested Party:
MA BOARD OF BAR OVERSEERS and MASSACHUSETTS SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT
Hayes v. Major League Baseball Advanced Media, L.P.
as 1:2022cv05822
Plaintiff:
James Hayes
Defendant:
Major League Baseball Advanced Media, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question
James Bey, III v. State of Iowa
as 22-2130
Petitioner:
James Hayes Bey, III
Respondent:
State of Iowa
Jeff Brown, et al v. 3M Company, et al
as 21-1834
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Scott McWhorter, Edward Young, Terrence Collins and others
Defendant / Appellant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
In re: James Hayes, Jr.
as 16-14523
Petitioner:
In re: JAMES HAYES, JR.
Successive Habeas Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
