Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Mitchell McGhee v. Jamie Davis, et al
as 21-3150
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MITCHELL MCGHEE
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMIE DAVIS, BRIAN ASBELL, JOSEPH M. NEEDHAM and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01990
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Vizant Technologies LLC, et al v. Julie Whitchurch, et al
as 16-1824
Plaintiff - Appellee:
VIZANT TECHNOLOGIES LLC and JOSEPH BIZZARRO
Defendant - Appellant:
JULIE P. WHITCHURCH
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMIE DAVIS
In re: Julie Whitchurch
as 16-1372
Defendant - Petitioner:
In re: JULIE P. WHITCHURCH
Plaintiff - Respondent:
VIZANT TECHNOLOGIES LLC and JOSEPH BIZZARRO
Defendant - Respondent:
JAMIE DAVIS
Nominal Respondent:
HARVEY BARTLE, III
Vizant Technologies LLC, et al v. Julie Whitchurch, et al
as 16-1178
Plaintiff - Appellee:
VIZANT TECHNOLOGIES LLC and JOSEPH BIZZARRO
Defendant - Appellant:
JULIE P. WHITCHURCH and JAMIE DAVIS
Vizant Technologies, LLC et al v. Whitchurch et al
as 1:2016cv00212
Plaintiff:
Vizant Technologies, LLC and Joseph Bizzarro
Defendant:
Julie P. Whitchurch and Jamie Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1963
In re: Julie Whitchurch, et al
as 16-1005
Defendant - Petitioner:
In re: JULIE P. WHITCHURCH and JAMIE DAVIS, INDIVIDUALS
Plaintiff - Respondent:
VIZANT TECHNOLOGIES LLC and JOSEPH BIZZARRO
Nominal Respondent:
HARVEY BARTLE, III
Vizant Technologies, LLC et al v. Whitchurch et al
as 1:2015mi00094
Plaintiff:
Vizant Technologies, LLC and Joseph Bizzarro
Defendant:
Julie P. Whitchurch and Jamie Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1963
VIZANT TECHNOLOGIES, LLC et al v. WHITCHURCH et al
as 2:2015cv00431
Plaintiff:
VIZANT TECHNOLOGIES, LLC and JOSEPH BIZZARRO
Defendant:
JULIE P. WHITCHURCH and JAMIE DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Johnson & Johnson, et al v. States, et al
as 13-606
Petitioner:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON and ETHICON, INC.
Respondent:
MICHELLE STATES, PATRICIA ORDINO, KIM DARNALL and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
