Cases 1 - 10 of 254
Bailey v. Multnomah County Sheriff's Office, et al.
as 24-2798
Plaintiff:
EDWARD BAILEY
Defendant:
MULTNOMAH COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, MICHAEL REESE, CPT. ERIC P. SMITH and others
Burrell v. Bishop
as 24-1155
Plaintiff:
AKO K. BURRELL
Defendant:
BISHOP, Deputy of Security, Sergeant LOCKE, Sergeant CONTO and others
Shomo v. State of New York
as 24-818
Plaintiff:
JOSE SHOMO
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW YORK, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND COMMUNITY SUPERVISION, STEWART ECKERT, Superintendent, individually and in official capacity and others
Iraheta v. Doe (1) et al
as 4:2024cv01163
Plaintiff:
Jose D. Iraheta
Defendant:
John Doe (1), John Doe (2), John Doe (3) and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Burrell v. Bishop
as 24-717
Plaintiff:
AKO K. BURRELL
Defendant:
BISHOP, Deputy Security, Sergeant LOCKE, Sergeant CONTO and others
ATLAS DATA PRIVACY CORPORATION et al v. Commercial Real Estate Exchange, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv04073
Plaintiff:
ATLAS DATA PRIVACY CORPORATION, JANE DOE-1, JANE DOE-2 and others
Defendant:
Commercial Real Estate Exchange, Inc., RICHARD ROES 1-10 and ABC COMPANIES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Doe 1, et al. v. Meta Platforms, Inc.
as 24-1672
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE 1 and JANE DOE 2
Defendant:
META PLATFORMS, INC., a Delaware corporation
Doe No.1 et al v. Rajveer LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00175
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe #1, Jane Doe #2, Jane Doe #3 and others
Defendant:
RAJVEER LLC, ATHARV, LLC, RAJPRABHU HOTEL LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1589 Trafficking Victims Protection Act (TVPA)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1278
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Doe 1 et al v. Palpung Thubten Choling
as 7:2023cv10117
Defendant:
Palpung Thubten Choling and Kagyu Thubten Choling
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 2 and Jane Doe 3
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
