Cases 1 - 10 of 204
Hernandez-Pineda v. Garland
as 24-1092
Petitioner:
JOSE HERNANDEZ-PINEDA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Rossy v. City of Buffalo
as 23-7296
Defendant / Appellant:
CITY OF BUFFALO, and its agents, servants and employees, JUSTIN TEDESCO, Buffalo Police Department P.O., JOSEPH ACQUINO, Buffalo Police Department P.O. and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MARGARITA ROSSY, as Administrator of the Estate of Jose Hernandez-Rossy
Defendant:
AMERICAN MEDICAL RESPONSE, and its agents, servants and employees
Hernandez-Gamon v. Garland
as 23-9599
Petitioner:
JOSE HERNANDEZ-GAMON
Respondent:
MERRICK GARLAND, Attorney General
Moraga, et al v. Garland
as 23-9597
Petitioner:
ILEANA MORAGA, ILLIANA HERNANDEZ MORAGA, JOSE HERNANDEZ CASTELLON and others
Respondent:
MERRICK GARLAND, Attorney General
USA v. Jose Hernandez
as 23-13336
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSE HERNANDEZ
Reynaldo Gonzalez, et al v. Google LLC
as 18-16700
Plaintiff / Appellant:
REYNALDO GONZALEZ, THE ESTATE OF NOHEMI GONZALEZ, BEATRIZ GONZALEZ, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of of Nohemi Gonzalez and others
Defendant / Appellee:
GOOGLE LLC
Amicus Curiae:
ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION and ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE LAW AND POLICY INSTITUTE
Sochil Martin v. La Luz Del Mundo et al
as 2:2020cv01437
Defendant:
Jose Luis Estrada, Alma Zamora De Joaquin, Jose Hernandez and others
Plaintiff:
Sochil Martin
Intervenor:
People of The State of California
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Juan Hernandez Domingo v. U.S. Attorney General
as 23-11045
Petitioner:
JUAN JOSE HERNANDEZ DOMINGO
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
