Cases 1 - 10 of 10
USA v. Baker
as 21-10920
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Kevin Baker
Michael Greene v. David Ballard
as 20-6454
Defendant / Appellee:
SARAH COOPER, Psy. Dr./MHU Staff, SHANNON COLEMAN, MHU Staff, KEN BOWLIN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL JERMAINE GREENE
King v. G4S Secure Solutions (USA) Inc et al
as 1:2018cv00488
Plaintiff:
Joseph M King
Defendant:
G4S Secure Solutions (USA) Inc , Chuck Brock , Don Drent and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Eacret v. Baker et al
as OKN/4:17-cv-00559
Plaintiff:
Carl Eacret
Defendant:
Kevin Baker , Cook Incorporated , Cook Group Incorporated and others
Martinez et al v Shulkin
as 8:2017cv01671
Petitioner:
Narciso Martinez , Evelyn Martinez , Keith Litchfield and others
Respondent:
David J. Shulkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MARTINEZ et al v SHULKIN
as 1:2017cv00128
Plaintiff:
NARCISO MARTINEZ , EVELYN MARTINEZ , KEITH LITCHFIELD and others
Defendant:
DAVID J SHULKIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Arthmann v. National Recovery Solutions, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv21596
Plaintiff:
Gregory Arthmann
Defendant:
National Recovery Solutions, Inc., Timothy Mroczek, Kevin Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Dwayne A. Sutherland v. Michael Chertoff et al
as 2:2008cv03458
Defendant:
Kevin Baker, Michael Chertoff, DOES and others
Plaintiff:
Dwayne A Sutherland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00245
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
United States of America v. Guardian Communication, Inc et al
as 4:2007cv04070
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Guardian Communication, Inc, United States Voice Broadcasting, Inc and Kevin . Baker
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 6101 Telemarketing Act/Consumer Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
