Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Arzate Hernandez, et al. v. Garland
as 23-834
Petitioner:
ITZEL ARZATE HERNANDEZ and KEVIN DANIEL MONDRAGON ARZATE
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
In re: 3M Company
as 22-0505
Petitioner:
In re: 3M COMPANY, fka Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company
Respondent:
BRIAN ADAMS, ALICE ADAMS, EDWARD ADAMS and others
Williams et al v. Capshaw Development Company, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv05024
Plaintiff:
Robert Williams and Michael Dotson
Defendant:
Capshaw Development Company, LLC, Geosam Capital US, LP, Kevin Daniel and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
Mickelsen, et al v. Aramark Sports
as 21-4084
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STACEY MICKELSEN, KIRK R. MICKELSEN and AMY V. BELLUM
Consolidated Plaintiff:
SUMMER PARADISE INC, ROGER COMSTOCK, PRESTON MILLER and others
Plaintiff:
FERDINAND MEYER, SHANNON MENDONCA and JYLL SCOTT
Defendant / Appellee:
ARAMARK SPORTS AND ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES, DBA Lake Powell Resorts & Marinas
Consolidated Defendant:
TRACEE COMSTOCK
3Rd Party Defendant:
THE ESTATE OF DONALD BELLUM and GREIG BELLUM
Kevin Sauceda Bejarno v. Andrea Montoya Jimenez
as 20-2710
Respondent / Appellee:
ANDREA DAYANA MONTOYA JIMENEZ
Petitioner / Appellant:
KEVIN DANIEL SAUCEDA BEJARNO
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv04798
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
SAUCEDA BEJARNO v. MONTOYA JIMENEZ
as 2:2019cv17524
Defendant:
Andrea Dayana Montoya Jimenez
Plaintiff:
Kevin Daniel Sauceda Montoya
Petitioner:
KEVIN DANIEL SAUCEDA BEJARNO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kevin Quillinan v. Russell Ainsworth, et al
as 18-16197
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN DANIEL QUILLINAN
Defendant - Appellee:
RUSSELL AINSWORTH, DANIEL BORNSTEIN, DANIEL CHEUNG and others
Kevin Quillinan v. Russell Ainsworth, et al
as 18-16163
Plaintiff - Appellee:
KEVIN DANIEL QUILLINAN
Defendant - Appellant:
RUSSELL AINSWORTH, DANIEL BORNSTEIN, DANIEL CHEUNG and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
