Cases 1 - 10 of 158
D' Souza v. City of San Clemente, et al.
as 24-2423
Plaintiff:
FREDA PHILOMENA D' SOUZA
Defendant:
CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE, a municipal corporation, ADAM ATAMIAN and ANTHONY KURTZ
KURTZ v. APPLE INC.
as 2:2024cv04355
Plaintiff:
STACEY KURTZ
Defendant:
APPLE INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
Honigman v. Kimberly-Clark Corporation
as 24-454
Plaintiff:
GLADYS HONIGMAN, Individually and on behalf of all others Similarly situated and D. JOSEPH KURTZ
Appellant:
THEODORE H. FRANK
Defendant:
KIMBERLY-CLARK CORPORATION
Kurtz v. Kimberly-Clark Corporation
as 24-425
Plaintiff:
D. JOSEPH KURTZ, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated
Appellant:
THEODORE H. FRANK
Defendant:
KIMBERLY-CLARK CORPORATION and COSTCO WHOLESALE CO.
Kakar Kurtz v. Dr. Marie Lupica
as 23-7548
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHVETA KAKAR KURTZ, DANIEL L. KURTZ, solely in their roles as parentguardians, AMNA KAKAR KURTZ, a minor child and others
Defendant / Appellee:
MARIE LUPICA, as an individual, Treating Physician and State Actor Operating Under Color of Law and NEW YORK PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL, /WeillCornell Medical Center
Defendant:
DAVID HANSELL, as the Duly Appointed Commissioner of the New York City Administration for Children's Services, DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION, CITY OF NEW YORK and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv08534
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Kurtz v. Progress Software Corporation et al
as MA/1:23-CV-12156
Plaintiff:
Kurtz and Lisa Bunner Kurtz
Defendant:
Progress Software Corporation and TD Ameritrade, Inc.
Dunn, et al v. Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company, et al
as 23-705
Petitioner:
STEVE OKSTAD, MICHAEL ANDERSON, BROOKE BALOCCA and others
Respondent:
SANTA FE NATURAL TOBACCO COMPANY, INC. and REYNOLDS AMERICAN, INC.
Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company, et al v. Dunn, et al
as 23-706
Petitioner:
SANTA FE NATURAL TOBACCO COMPANY, INC., REYNOLDS AMERICAN, INC. and R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY
Respondent:
ANTHONY DUNN, CEYHAN HAKSAL, MICHAEL ROBINSON and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00571
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
