Cases 1 - 10 of 391
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Lacy
as 8:2024cv01145
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Tyrone J Lacy
In re: Walmart Inc. Securities Litigation, et al, et al
as 24-1818
Plaintiff:
KIM KENGLE, as trustee of the Kim K.Kengle 2000 Trust and ROSEANNE LACY
Defendant:
WALMART INC, C. DOUGLAS MCMILLON and M. BRETT BIGGS, JR.
SM Merger/Arbitrage, L.P. v. Bristol Myers Squibb Company
as 24-826
Plaintiff:
MANGROVE PARTNERS MASTER FUND, LTD., SM MERGER/ARBITRAGE, L.P., on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, MASO CAPITAL INVESTMENTS LIMITED and others
Defendant:
BRISTOLMYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, GIOVANNI CAFORIO, VICKI L. SATO and others
Piippo v. Blubaugh et al
as 4:2024cv10618
Plaintiff:
Lacy-Ann Piippo
Defendant:
Eric Blubaugh, Jillian Sadler and Douglas Mitchell
Anthony LacyIn re: Anthony Lacy
as 24-5143
Petitioner:
In re: ANTHONY JOSEPH LACY
Respondent:
ZAC POUNDS
Bluebeck Holdings, Ltd. v. SWN Production Company, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv02095
Plaintiff:
Bluebeck Holdings, Ltd.
Defendant:
SWN Production Company, LLC, Southwestern Energy Company, SWN Energy Services Company, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
United States v. Nathaniel Lacy
as 23-3242
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Nathaniel Lacy, also known as Nathaniel Bradley
Murphy v. Argo Blockchain plc et al
as 1:2023cv07305
Lead Plaintiff:
Richard Hawes
Plaintiff:
Aaron Murphy
Petitioner:
Brian Begay, Benjamin Lamontagne, Ever Garcia and others
Defendant:
Argo Blockchain plc, Peter Wall, Alex Appleton and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Franco et al v. Chobani, LLC
as 1:2023cv03047
Plaintiff:
Jason Franco, Abigail Franco, Misty M Lacy and others
Defendant:
Chobani, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
