Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Rouse et al v. LeMay et al
as 1:2022cv00129
Plaintiff:
Latasha Rouse, Exabia Rouse, Daniel Riley and others
Defendant:
George LeMay and Lawrence J Hogan
Joseph McCoy v. Angel Gonzales, et al
as 21-16878
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH RAYMOND MCCOY
Defendant / Appellee:
ANGEL GONZALES, C. STRONACH, K. LEMAY and others
Defendant:
J. CLARK KELSO, KEN CLARK, Warden and A. ENENMOH
Committee Overseeing Action for Lumber v. US
as 22-1078
Plaintiff / Appellee:
COMMITTEE OVERSEEING ACTION FOR LUMBER INTERNATIONAL TRADE INVESTIGATIONS OR NEGOTIATIONS and FONTAINE INC.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
GOVERNMENT OF CANADA, MARCEL LAUZON INC., LES PRODUITS FORESTIERS D&G LTEE and others
Committee Overseeing Action for Lumber v. US
as 22-1068
Plaintiff:
COMMITTEE OVERSEEING ACTION FOR LUMBER INTERNATIONAL TRADE INVESTIGATIONS OR NEGOTIATIONS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FONTAINE INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES, GOVERNMENT OF CANADA, MARCEL LAUZON INC. and others
In re: A. L., et al v. Ring LLC
as 21-55872
Not Classified By Court:
In re: RING LLC PRIVACY LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee:
A. L., J. B., M. M. and others
Defendant / Appellant:
RING LLC
United States v. Smith
as 21-6012
Defendant / Appellant:
TECRIC LEMAY SMITH
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Gene Barris v. United States
as 21-1080
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America
Petitioner / Appellant:
Gene Lemay Barris
Joseph McCoy v. J. Kelso, et al
as 20-17113
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH RAYMOND MCCOY
Defendant / Appellee:
ANGEL GONZALES, A. ENENMOH, R. FISHER and others
Jennifer L.M. LeMay, et al v. Michael B. Mays, et al
as 20-2632
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Jennifer L.M. LeMay, personally, and as guardian of CLE, VE, minors and Courtney J. Livingston
Defendant / Appellant:
Michael B. Mays and City of Minneapolis
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
