Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Clark v. State of Connecticut
as 23-8105
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GORDON CLARK, -, in his individual capacity, in his capacities as husband, sole fiduciary, sole beneficiary, and sole creditor of the Estate of Lillian J. Clark
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF CONNECTICUT, Office of Governor NED LAMONT, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Rover Pipeline LLC v. Rover Tract No. PA WA HL-004.5, et al
as 19-1613
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES M. BUCHANAN AND DIANE ZACK BUCHANAN FARM #4 LP, and, PEOPLES NATURAL GAS CO, c/o Corporation Service Company, GRETCHEN RHEINLANDER, husband and wife and others
Defendant:
FRED C. STROUD, BARBARA MINGES SHEPERD, PNC MORTGAGE, a division of PNC Bank, Nation Association and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROVER PIPELINE LLC
Parshall v. Jacksonville Bancorp, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00889
Plaintiff:
Paul Parshall
Defendant:
Jacksonville Bancorp, Inc., John C. Williams, Harmon B. Deal, III and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 78
Genie Marie Buchanan v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2018cv02051
Plaintiff:
Genie M. Buchanan
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Boeing Company, et al v. Gary Spano, et al
as 13-8026
Petitioner:
BOEING COMPANY, EMPLOYEE BENEFITS PLANS COMMITTEE, SCOTT M. BUCHANAN and others
Respondent:
GARY SPANO, as representatives of a class of similarly situated person, an on behalf of the Plan, JOHN BUNK and JAMES WHITE, JR.
Boeing Company, et al v. Gary Spano, et al
as 08-8032
Petitioner:
BOEING COMPANY, EMPLOYEE BENEFITS PLANS COMMITTEE, SCOTT M. BUCHANAN and others
Respondent:
GARY SPANO, as representatives of a class of similarly situated person, an on behalf of the Plan, JOHN BUNK and JAMES WHITE, JR.
Spano et al v. Boeing Company et al
as 1:2008mc00237
Plaintiff:
Gary Spano, John Bunk and James White, Jr.
Defendant:
Boeing Company, Employee Benefits Plans Committee, Scott M. Buchanan and others
Movant:
Teacher Retirement System of Texas
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
