Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Carroll Independent School District v. United States Department of Education et al
as 4:2024cv00461
Plaintiff: Carroll Independent School District
Defendant: United States Department of Education, Miguel Cardona, in his capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Education, Catherine E. Lhamon, in her official capacity as Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights at the United States Department of Education and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
TikTok Inc., et al v. Merrick Garland
as 24-1113
Petitioner: TikTok Inc. and ByteDance Ltd.
Respondent: Merrick B. Garland, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States,
Firearms Regulatory Accountability Coalition, Inc., et al v. Merrick B. Garland, et al
as 23-3230
Plaintiff / Appellant: Firearms Regulatory Accountability Coalition, Inc., State of West Virginia, State of North Dakota and others
Defendant / Appellee: Merrick B. Garland, in his Official Capacity, as Attorney General of the United States, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, The and Steven Dettelbach, in his Official Capacity, as Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives
Appellant: Members of Congress
Frank Adams v. Merrick Garland
as 23-5098
Plaintiff / Appellant: Frank Adams
Defendant / Appellee: Merrick B. Garland, In his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States
Hanif Khan v. Lyle Boelens
as 21-7731
Petitioner: HANIF KHAN
Respondent: LYLE BOELENS, in his official capacity as Acting Washington Field Office Director, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States, ATTORNEY GENERAL MERRICK B. GARLAND, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States and others
Domingo Gomez, et al v. Joseph Biden, Jr., et al
as 21-5288
Plaintiff / Appellee: Domingo Arreguin Gomez, a Lawful Permanent Resident of the U.S., Mirna S., a Lawful Permanent Resident of the U.S., Vicenta S., a U.S. Citizen and others
Defendant / Appellant: Joseph R. Biden, Jr., in his official capacity as President of the United States of America, Merrick B. Garland, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States, United States Department of State and others
Sylvain v. Garland
as 21-2897
Petitioner / Appellant: Colby Sylvain
Respondent / Appellee: Merrick B. Garland, in his official capacity as Attorney General, of the United States, Alejandro Mayorkas, in his official capacity as Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Jean King, in her official capacity as director of the Executive Office Of Immigration Review and others
Christopher Thieme v. Merrick Garland, et al
as 21-5211
Plaintiff / Appellant: Christopher Thieme
Defendant / Appellee: Merrick B. Garland, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States, United States Department of Justice and United States Sentencing Commission
State of Texas v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv00194
Plaintiff: State of Texas
Defendant: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, CHARLOTTE A. BURROWS, in her official capacity as Chairman of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, MERRICK B. GARLAND, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Alpha Mansaray v. Andrea King-Wessels
as 21-7166
Petitioner: ALPHA IBRAHIM BAH MANSARAY
Respondent: ANDREA KING-WESSELS, in her official capacity as Acting Director of the Howard County Detention Center, FRANCISCO MADRIGAL, in his official capacity as Acting Field Office Director of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Removal Operations Baltimore Field Office, ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, in his official capacity as Secretary of Homeland Security and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?